The premise of I am the Messenger is about this guy named Ed Kennedy who is just a very mediocre guy. He's not very good at anything but not totally awful at everything either (except sex. He mentions that he's terrible at sex)--he's just a regular Joe. He works as a cabdriver in a relatively small town, has three close friends, one of which he is hopelessly in love with, and a very smelly old dog named the Doorman. Early on in the book, he tells the readers that cards play an important role in his life--he would often have his friends over to play cards and he would soon discover how important cards would become.
One day, he discovers a single playing card in his mailbox, the Ace of Diamonds. On it were three streets. Thus begins Ed's story as he goes to these various locations in order to help people. Each case contains a different person and each person has a different problem. As you might imagine, he receives the other three Aces, each slightly different in terms of clues and Ed continues to go around his town and help people.
The plot itself is really not bad at all. I like how it works out and the process is very suspenseful at times. However, the bad part is the author's writing style. Zusak is a good writer and his style worked beautifully for The Book Thief but for some reason, it just didn't click with me in this book. The short brief sentences that made his descriptions so powerful and emphatic just didn't seem to work as well for I am the Messenger. Keep in mind, this is just my opinion--many of my friends say that they loved this book and thought the writing worked fine but I just simply didn't enjoy it as much.
Also, there were several points in the plot in which I thought to myself, "How the hell is that even possible?? Nobody would ever react like that! Come on!". Perhaps the author realized this and only added it to add to the dramatization of the scene but I generally have a problem with unbelievability when it comes to realistic fiction.
That being said, I don't think that this is a bad book and isn't necessarily a waste of time to read. It has an interesting ending and certainly a very engaging plot line. I'd classify it under the category of "good time passer" but not exactly a "must read before you die". It's up to you. Good luck.
I agree with what you said. This book took me forever to read, and although the plot was interesting it wasn't that compelling. I don't actually even remember what happened which shows you how highly I thought of this book. Anyway, I think you summarized the plot and your feelings well. Nice job.
ReplyDeleteIf I run into a book that isn't school related that I really can't get into I just stop reading it. I give you credit for reading through to the end. The book sounds interesting but I don't think I will be picking it up anytime soon.
ReplyDelete"...but I generally have a problem with unbelievability when it comes to realistic fiction." I don't think you're the only one. Also, any book review that ends with "good luck" speaks volumes.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I'm probably going to read it anyway. XD
As much as I love Zusak for The Book Thief, I would probably not attempt to read another book by him. The Book Thief was in my opinion a wonderful if not nearly flawless piece of writing filled with the perfect balance of plot and eloquence. Maybe it's just my quirkiness, but I don't want to ruin my opinion of Zusak.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, I am quite amazed that you managed to even read anything outside of school these days. With the workload I know you have, it's unbelievable. Good post though I won't read the book.
I liked it a lot actually. Then again, I'm not the sort of person who cares too much about writing quality. I believe you when you say his writing style doesn't work like it did for The Book Thief. I just didn't notice it because I just focus on the plot. Hence my liking of poorly written books like Eragon, Eldest, and even Twilight.
ReplyDelete